Wednesday, September 5, 2012

Platform Posturing


When your opponent is shooting himself in the foot, you don’t help him.

That was exactly my reaction when I heard about all this right wing high-fiving about the Democratic Convention changing the language in their platform.

Overnight the Republican smear machine launched a campaign about the absence of the word “God” and the reference to Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel from their platform. 

The right-wing “blogonuts” sprang up, in almost virtual unison, reporting the news and running the video of the contentious votes by the convention on these changes.

However, apparently in their characteristic short-sightedness, they failed to realize the implications of the event that inspired their jubilation.

Two points they have been making relentlessly are the failure of President Obama as a leader as well as that their own candidate, Mitt Romney, was not bound by his Party’s platform.

One thing that the reporting on this matter has made clear is President Obama’s direct intervention in making this change happen. Given the videos that the reactionary “blogonuts” are so fond of promoting regarding the convention’s vote on this matter it is clear that the canard about President Obama not leading is absurd.

It is reminiscent of the famous story about their most treasured Party icon, Abraham Lincoln, at a cabinet meeting relative to a vote on an issue about the Civil War. Lincoln called for the vote. All the members of his cabinet voted against it. Lincoln voted for it. The President then announced “the ayes have it”.

Contrast this to Mitt Romney’s way of dealing with the Republican Party Platform.

He has disagreed with his Vice-Presidential candidate on the issue of abortion. He has disagreed with his Party’s Platform on the issue.

Did he stand up to change it?

I don’t think so? Excuse me, I know so.

And the Republicans want to criticize the President for a lack of leadership?

Clearly, President Obama would not stand for running on a Platform that he could not endorse.

Equally clear is that his opponent has no such qualms. But, that’s characteristic. In fact, it highlights the issue of character.

5 comments:

  1. So in other words the translation is that Obama was worried about the effect on the independent vote and corrected the platform to keep votes. Gotcha!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. With that ability to spin a story you should be working for Fox News.

      Delete
  2. ok next on Fox -
    Democratic Delegate member threatens Romney's life on National tV!
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/06/mitt-romney-death-threat-_n_1862605.html?icid=maing-grid7%7Cmain5%7Cdl2%7Csec3_lnk1%26pLid%3D202143#ooid=R1bzh0NTpwaNPqpSyEWM46BnAwNU_AfK

    If the huffington PooP is covering it I certainly don't expect brushback on this as an unreliable source. :>)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Julia Rodriguez, a Democratic delegate from New York, is reportedly under investigation by the Secret Service after she told a reporter at the Democratic National Convention that she would like to 'kill' GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney."

      I'm also sure that the comment will amount to nothing more than another non-issue that the right wing nuts will try to make into another cause celebre.

      Can't deal with issues, just this kind of nonsense.

      Typical.

      Delete

All comments subject to moderation. All commenters must use their own name or a screen name. No comments labelled as "Anonymous" will be published. To use your name or a screen name select "Name/URL" from the drop down menu. Insert you name in the "Name" space and leave the "URL" space blank.