Thursday, December 4, 2014

Have We Learned Anything?

Ken O’Brien

Members of the Southbridge School Committee now have the results of the so-called Flick report regarding allegations made by school personnel against the Superintendent.

It is doubtful that the public will ever learn the results of this report.

Is it not time to ask whether this is appropriate?

After our miserable experience in this district with the administration of our school system the time has come to ask whether the results of such investigations should remain private. 

It is one thing to say that the results of an investigation have exonerated the accused.

However, we know that was not the case in prior situations.

Nevertheless, existing procedures, whether in law or policy, shield those who have been found to have violated the rights or reputation of others and allow them to continue in the system. They usually continue with their careers here or elsewhere.

In so doing we are, implicitly if not explicitly, perpetuating a level of incompetence in a system that is supposedly directed toward one of the most sacred obligations of our society – the education of our children.

How many times have we retained the services of an individual who would have been summarily rejected if such information was readily available?

Further, in the current case, there are grounds to report the result whatever they are. Either the Superintendent is guilty of the offenses with which she is charged or the investigation will point up a conspiracy by subordinates to discredit her. There is no middle ground. And, in either case, the public is entitled to know. They are also entitled to judge for themselves whether the sanctions that might be imposed are commensurate with the offense.

If someone chooses a career in public service, whether it is in education, the police, the fire department, or some other capacity, they must be held accountable for their service to the public. If that trust is found to have been violated we, the taxpayers, as their employers, are entitled to make a judgment as to their culpability and their punishment. It serves no useful purpose to allow it to be swept under the rug as the result of some claim that it relates to personnel policy. It certainly benefits no one to allow them to continue in that career path somewhere else with no recognition or acknowledgement of their previous actions. Otherwise we are merely perpetuating systematic incompetence. 

It is time for the results of such investigations to be made public if wrongdoing is found. It is time for our legislators to amend existing laws to reflect that accountability and to insulate the investigative body and the public from any consequences unless corruption of the process is proven.

8 comments:

  1. No - We Will Never KnowDecember 4, 2014 at 5:59 PM

    I believe that Brent Abrahamson is in charge of everyone's accountability, not any state legislature!

    ReplyDelete
  2. If she truly is on VAKAY in FLA then she may be using her VAKAY Days because she knows what the investigation will report...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Word on Torrey Road is that all individuals involved in complaints against Superintendent of Schools Gardner have been served with "confidentiality" documents preventing them from speaking about the results of the Flick investigation and the resolution of the issue.

    The students, staff, community and taxpayers need to know the results of not only this report, but also of the school committee's ultimate resolution.

    More secrets from the "transparency" gang! More $$$$$ going out the door without explanation!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Me thinks the Superintendent was caught and now they are back pedaling. Mr Abrahmson one of the biggest shock and awe people of all time...he is agahast . The school committee is upset by accountability. Political cover madam Chair...so much for your ABC. Congrats Councilor Carrasco no need to apologize.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks Mr. CarascoDecember 9, 2014 at 8:54 PM

    Why was Abrahamson chastising the town council vice chair? Is he his boss?
    1. Gardner authorised a paid week off for all administrators, secretaries, and non instructional staff. (Trying to make friends?)
    2. The other noninstitutional town employees want the same hand out.
    3 Town Council says NFW.
    4. Superintendent got caught. (She should have stayed in FL)
    5. Good stop at more school committee money wasting!

    Thanks Mr. Carasco.

    ReplyDelete
  6. They did it last year under Buzz, no one had a problem then...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rrspect the TaxpayersDecember 10, 2014 at 8:34 AM

      Well it was wrong then, and it would be wrong now.
      If these positions are not necessary for these 5+ days, then the school committee should give them the time off - WITHOUT PAY.
      United Lens, Hyde's, Schotts, Harrington, or any other RESPONSIBLE employer gives 40+ employees unearned weeks off?

      This school district has no regard for the value of a taxpayer dollar.

      Delete
  7. Save our Schools --SOSDecember 11, 2014 at 8:15 AM

    The deafening silence from the SC and the district on the Flick Investigation is telling. If Gardner would have been vindicated by the report they would have been singing it from the rooftops. However, that is not the case and this too shall pass into the skeleton filled closet never to see the light of day. The real question is how much money will this "transparency" cost the taxpayers.

    ReplyDelete

All comments subject to moderation. All commenters must use their own name or a screen name. No comments labelled as "Anonymous" will be published. To use your name or a screen name select "Name/URL" from the drop down menu. Insert you name in the "Name" space and leave the "URL" space blank.