Thursday, April 21, 2016

Dean Cook Resigns From Board Of Health

By Brian Lee 
Telegram & Gazette Staff 

After cursing at a Southbridge resident during a heated meeting about the municipal landfill, Board of Health member Dean Cook has resigned from the five-member panel, Town Manager Ronald San Angelo said Thursday.
Mr. Cook, a 55-year-old computer programmer with a degree in chemistry, who once worked at Clean Harbors and ran for governor as a Libertarian candidate twice during the 1990s, resigned in an email to Mr. San Angelo's assistant. A signed and dated letter of resignation is still required, Mr. San Angelo said.
During an April 14 health board meeting, resident Erin Cummings-Lapriore, accompanied by her children, ages 2 and 5, accused officials from landfill operator Casella Waste Systems of affecting the health of area residents by contaminating groundwater and polluting private wells. 
“Get the answers to these people that have the (expletive) contaminated wells and let’s get it closed and shut down,” she said of the landfill.
Mrs. Cummings-Lapriore then demanded that Mr. Cook not roll his eyes while she spoke, to which Mr. Cook snapped, “I’ll roll my eyes at anyone I damn well (expletive) please.”
In an interview Thursday, Mr. Cook said his term is ending in June, and he had learned that the council's majority had decided not to reappoint him. "They supposedly had enough votes to remove me, so why make a sideshow," he said.
Mr. Cook said he has served on town boards for 10 years, accounting for what he called "hundreds of hours of work."
He said references to 1,4-dioxane, one of the contaminants found in private wells of homes in Charlton, as "a human toxin," while "technically accurate," were misleading. Aspirin and Vitamin A are toxic, too, he suggested. It's a matter of consumption levels, he said, and someone weighing 220 pounds would have to take in 510 grams, which is "like drinking half a liter of pure 1,4 dioxane."
Moreover, 1,4-dioxane is not bioaccumulative, he said.
Meanwhile, Mr. Cook said he did not believe resigning was the proper course of action, but "I don’t think anything I could do at this point would make it better."\
He asserted: "All you can do is get along with the people in front of the camera who are misquoting poorly sourced facts, repeating inaccuracies over and over and over again, and basically standing up there saying the only source is the landfill. Well, that's not true - no matter how many times you say it."
He said a student of "Geology 101" would reason that the plume is headed toward the landfill, not away, "because the basic principle of plumes is the higher concentrations are closest to the source." In this case, the highest concentrations of known contamination in Charlton are farthest from the landfill, he said.
Asked why he cursed at Mrs. Cummings-Lapriore, Mr. Cook said, "I was frustrated. Out of 10 years, you have a moment of bad judgment. I didn’t swear at her, I swore in front of everybody. There’s a difference, and I apologized to everybody right then."
He added that his patience was low because his wife is recovering from surgery, he hadn't slept much and he had been stuck in traffic.
When Mrs. Cummings-Lapriore asked landfill site manager Tracy Markham and her colleagues how they slept at night, Mr. Cook said he found the comment "outrageous" and "uncalled for." He called Ms. Markham "the most competent person" and said she "takes so much abuse from these people who are spouting misinformation all the time."
Mr. Cook said his board "put tons of requirements on Casella," including making the landfill operator put in extra wells and air protection measures.
"We are collecting data left and right on these people," he said. "If there was anything to be seen, I’d be the first person to say they were at fault."
Mrs. Cummings-Lapriore, 38, said she was happy that Mr. Cook resigned. She called his behavior "unprofessional and uncalled for, especially in front of children."
She said she hopes the town replaces Mr. Cook with someone of a more diverse background and "maybe these meetings won’t weigh on the side of Casella, as they tend to do so."
A resident of Route 169 near the landfill, Mrs. Cummings-Lapriore said her family suffers from constant truck traffic to the landfill six days a week at 7 a.m. She said the family constantly picks up trash in the yard from trash trucks.
Although the home is on public water and sewer lines, Mrs. Cummings-Lapriore, who also has a 7-year-old child, said she feels badly for people with contaminated wells.
"This town owes them an answer and a solution," she said. "It breaks my heart that people are showering for two minutes (to limit potential exposure) and are brushing their teeth and cooking with bottled water."
The town manager thanked Mr. Cook for his service and wished him well.
"The town appreciates all the volunteer time he gave to make Southbridge a better community," Mr. San Angelo said.
Though pleased that Mr. Cook publicly apologized during the meeting, Mr. San Angelo said that "clearly, this is something that the town does not expect from any of its board members, and I think Dean made a very good choice in deciding to resign."
Mr. San Angelo he had discussed options with Mr. Cook, including the manager's power to recommend that he be removed or not be reappointed.
Mr. San Angelo said he received calls from residents and councilors about the incident. Mr. Cook had both detractors and supporters.
The call to fill the vacancy comes at an important time, given Casella's looming request for a site assignment to expand the landfill, a source of many residents' frustration in Southbridge, Sturbridge and Charlton.
But because the health board covers a variety of topics, Mr. San Angelo said, the landfill would not be a litmus test for any applicant, and he was "not looking for anyone who's taken a big public position for or against" the landfill.
"I’m looking for people who are honest, intelligent, can be objective and look at the facts of any public health issue that comes before them."

5 comments:

  1. Sihit or Stay on the PotApril 23, 2016 at 11:21 AM

    Never before can I recall a public official anywhere resign yet continue to spew his or her excuses and justifications ike Mister Cook has.

    And the posted Telegram story opens the door for Mister Cook's resignation not being accepted,does it not?

    The Town Council needs to accept this resignation with enthusiasm Monday night. Sure, say thank you, but be clear that his can not be reappointed to any positions for at least 36 months in the spirit of preserving dignity. Let's hope this is the low point of our BiCentennial year?

    His continued quest to defend his Laundry Detetgent Conspiracy Theory is more offensive than his vile rudeness. I thought the Masons were Gentlemen and somewhat scholarly. The laundry detergent theory is like blaming a case of Hep C on a public toilet seat. It is time for the Malarkey to cease.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Massachusetts Issues Guidance on Addressing 1,4 Dioxane Sites

    If you a capable of hearing the facts here they are.

    http://www.environmentallawportal.com/massachusetts-issues-guidance-on-addressing-1-4-dioxane-sites

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dog ate your homework?April 23, 2016 at 7:51 PM

      Dean, you keep putting that link up, but the DEP confirms that it does not apply in this case yet you keep trying to blame the victims.

      "If you a capable of hearing the facts?" I reviewed this over a month ago, it offers potential connections in some curcumstances, but the circumstances do not match.

      You claimed on the Telegram that the levels are higher at the victims wells than the landfill, a landfill that the DEP has stated needs more testing wells, but even without additional testing wells, the levels are greater at the landfill.

      You are not the only Casella apologist on the board-one member told the crowd at the meeting that contamination on the south side of the landfill could have flowed hundreds of feet uphill from factories years ago.

      My Mother used to believe the hickies on my neck and shoulders were from getting hit by golf balls. It appears that a similar tale to cover up the true cause has been created so the board of health can once again approve something they should not-a dirty business that IS a threat to our health and the environment!

      Delete
  3. @Dog ate your homework?(john) keeps talk about this letter from the DEP that was see by anyone but him, for some unknown person that believe that 1-4 dioxane can only go from groundwater to bedrock near landfill not ant place else.
    I never say the level at the landfill was lower. I pointed out that the VOC's can not get a 1/2 mile away without going through the space in between. The drinking water inbetween have no VOC's. This is not quantum mechanics chemical can not jump from one place to another without going thought the space in between. Everyone that have been asked states that 1-4 dioxane will all way lead the plume of VOC's. Look at the map that mean the plume is moving toward the landfill not away.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dean, Mr. Coletta's statement that the people with the contaminated well water are NOT considered potentially responsible by the DEP was sent to numerous people,including a local reporter, Ms. "Dog Ate your homework", and others, so like so many of your comments, you are incorrect in your claim that this statement was seen only by me.

      Also, if you take the time to read the WGBH article, you will discover that the blame is placed squarely upon the landfill by DEP staff and our former Health Department Director.

      Lastly, any true chemist knows that 1,4 dioxane travels through soil faster than V.O.C.'s and that it is very possible for V.O.C.'s to not be present where 1,4 dioxane is present. Yet, as you SHOULD know, V.O.C.'s are present in some of the wells. So are other chemicals that are not even tested for by the town or the operator!

      As you know from the various board of health meetings I have attended, as concerned as I am over the groundwater contamination, I am even MORE upset about the poor air quality that sickened much of the community on Tuesday night, but even worse are the gases with little or no odor that are a perfect match for the cause of unprecedented asthma growth in our community. At one meeting that I brought this up, you did your infamous eye roll and blamed cigarettes without even conducting tests.

      Delete

All comments subject to moderation. All commenters must use their own name or a screen name. No comments labelled as "Anonymous" will be published. To use your name or a screen name select "Name/URL" from the drop down menu. Insert you name in the "Name" space and leave the "URL" space blank.