Friday, June 17, 2016

27 Southbridge Teachers Given Walking Papers

Southbridge school district cuts 27 teachers
By Brian Lee

Twenty-seven teachers with fewer than three years' experience in the district have been told not to come back next year; the number is high, but not a surprise, given the state takeover of the Southbridge public schools earlier this year, the teachers union president said this week.

School districts aren't required to give teachers who haven’t held their positions for three years a reason for not being renewed. 

In addition, Southbridge Education Association President Joan Sullivan expressed concern for the fate of education assistants. The teachers contract gives the district until June 30 to notify education assistants about their job status, she said.

The district of about 2,200 students was deemed a Level 5 chronically underperforming system in January, after being designated underperforming since 2004.

"As the union," Mrs. Sullivan said of its approximately 250 members, "we’re doing everything we can to help people who have not been renewed. That’s the best that we can do."

Mrs. Sullivan said she was glad that the 27 teachers, most of whom worked at the middle-high school, were notified earlier than what was required of the district.

Jessica Huizenga, the state-appointed receiver for the public schools, said the teachers who were let go were notified four weeks in advance.

The notification process, she said, was developed collaboratively with the SEA because of the desire to give the teachers the opportunity to seek employment elsewhere, during the height of hiring season for educators.

At the same time, the receiver said, Southbridge schools wanted to be poised to post positions to attract quality candidates.

Meanwhile, the fate of teachers with three or more years' experience remains in limbo because of changes the state can make to Southbridge contracts.

The district turnaround plan is to be unveiled June 24, officials said.

Under the Achievement Gap Act, the commissioner and the receiver, through the turnaround plan, may limit, suspend or change one or more provisions of any collective bargaining agreement.

According to Mrs. Sullivan, veteran teachers were given letters of “reasonable assurance” of their job assignments for next year. Mrs. Sullivan said there were no end-of-year layoffs of veteran teachers.

However, the letters were issued in compliance with the existing teachers’ contract, which remains in effect until the turnaround plan materializes.

Mrs. Huizenga told a reporter that any actions taken before the launch of the turnaround plan have nothing to do with those that occur after the plan takes effect. But she declined to comment when asked about the prospect of the district letting go veteran teachers through the looming plan.

“My only comment in regards to this is, we’ve been working hand in hand with the union throughout this process,” she said. “The lines of communication have been open. We’ve been very transparent, are following the collective bargaining agreement and have been meeting on a regular basis (with union leadership), to ensure we’re moving forward together.”

Mrs. Sullivan, the union leader, said some teachers already left the district because they were “nervous about the changes.” When asked for the number of departures, she said it is still being determined because some had yet to give official notice. 

“We will see what the summer brings,” she said. “They have the right to be nervous and say, 'Maybe I don’t want to be here.' We really need people who are going to be enthusiastic - and they should go, if they feel they can find a better place. It is very stressful still. I think we’re all anticipating a great September, but we still haven’t seen the turnaround plan.”

4 comments:

  1. Just the first shoeJune 17, 2016 at 3:02 PM

    Note that this is just those with less than three years in the system. We're still waiting for the list of those with"tenure" who will get the ax.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Like these poor teachers that got the ax are the problem....NOT

    ReplyDelete
  3. Since Hanley, the successive superintendents and the bloated egos of the previous school committee have reeked havoc on the teaching staff. The superintendents like Ely, Buzz, and Gardner made sure they put the people in place that would carry out their edicts to get rid of the teachers who were instrumental in making progress in turning the schools around. This was especially true at the high school level.

    Bill Bishop hired a great crop of young and enthusiastic teachers while breathing renewed vigor in the professional staff. Dale Hanely and Bill Bishop, and his staff, created an atmosphere of learning, reduced the discipline problems, and created an atmosphere of learning in the high school. This combination moved SHS from a level 3 status to a level 1 in four or five years. However, those put in charge by the tumefied self-importance of the then school committee have driven all those teachers away by intimidation tactics or worse. This led to the ones who were left to just hunker down in their classrooms and stay off the radar.

    Now enter Empress Huizenga and her Praetorian Guard and we must ask the same question: Are these people just using Southbridge a line in a resume and a stepping stone to some greater opportunity like a teaching position at a prestigious university? Wasn't Buzz touted by the state to savior Southbridge needed?

    As I close this missive, let us remember all of those great teachers who were here four short years ago who have found greener pastures. However do not lose sight of the soon to be blossoming amount of unemployment dollars and the mounting law suits that will drain still more assets from the district.

    ReplyDelete

All comments subject to moderation. All commenters must use their own name or a screen name. No comments labelled as "Anonymous" will be published. To use your name or a screen name select "Name/URL" from the drop down menu. Insert you name in the "Name" space and leave the "URL" space blank.