Friday, October 11, 2013

Moriarty Opposes Use Of Public Funds To Lure Students Out Of District


First and foremost, a big thank you to Southbridge’s own Mike Murray for leading the charge in a justified fight that will be heard on Beacon Hill later this week. It can be argued whether Mr. Smith can truly go to Washington anymore, but he certainly can go to Boston.

I vividly remember coming home one afternoon and being surprised to see a postcard from the Quaboag Regional School District in my mailbox, touting the classes being offered, technology available, athletics and extra-curricular activities, and more. It seemed quite fitting that I found it nestled among flyers from used car dealers. It was later that day when my phone rang with Mike Murray on the other end, clearly agitated over the use of public funds to entice locals to send their kids — and tax dollars — elsewhere. 

The difficulties within Southbridge’s schools have been very well documented. I am asked regularly by people from other towns, “Is it really as bad as they say?” or “You would never work there, would you?” and “They just can’t get their act together, can they?”

The Town and its school district has developed a nasty reputation. Some of it is the product of self-loathing and a horribly negative self-image. Some of it is deserved. Some of it is pure make believe and fantasy.

What is not make believe and fantasy, however, is the impact the exploitation of school choice and what it has wrought upon the Town and local public school system. I understand the concerns and fears of many locals who have opted to take advantage of school choice, sending their child to another district. As a parent, one of your prerogatives is doing what you believe is best for your child. What many do not realize, however, is that local tax money is sent with that child to cover the costs of educating him or her in that out-of-town district, regardless of what the difference may be in per student expenditures. Unfortunately for local taxpayers, if, for any reason — including teacher contracts, cost savings of regionalization, or fewer extra-curricular opportunities, to name a few — the receiving district’s cost of educating the average student is less than the sending district’s cost, that receiving district is the beneficiary of a nice little cash windfall. That move means the cost of educating our Town’s youth remains the same, or even increases, while the number of kids being educated here goes down.

I can’t speak for Mike Murray, but my big problem is not necessarily with school choice, but the exploitation of school choice as a money-making endeavor. Education is expensive, and there are many reasons for that. Public elementary and secondary education is not, however, a business. Schools are supposed to compete for trophies on the athletic field, in show choir competitions, and quiz bowls, not for local tax dollars.

Senate Bill 1804, sponsored by State Senators Richard Moore (D-Uxbridge) and John Fernandes (D-Milford), will go a long way to prevent districts from using money to engage in predatory practices to steal money from other communities. The school choice windfall enjoyed by a district such as Quaboag more than covered the costs of the postcard production and mailings, all with the intent of padding that pile of cash further at the expense of our own tax dollars.

Let your representatives know how you feel about Senate Bill 1804. Let us better control our tax dollars by keeping our tax dollars locally rather than subsidizing the education of folks 40 minutes away.

9 comments:

  1. Out of district tuition is capped at $5,000 per student. In 2012 the Southbridge school district had 2,275 students. The maximum charge if all of them went out of district would be $11,375,000 (not counting special ed costs and transportation). That’s about half of our school department budget. If we can find enough spaces in better performing districts why not shut down our school system.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What next? Are you going to say other towns can’t use tax money for economic development to recruit new business because we’re lousy at that too?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Gus Steeves has an article in todays Southbridge News making the same kind of argument. He’s using the term predatory too. Take a look at Quaboag’s website at https://sites.google.com/a/quaboagrsd.org/qrsd/
    If Southbridge was doing that well it would do the same thing. The problem is your town isn’t doing as well. So, instead of admitting you have problems and fixing them you call them predators. Just like all who can’t make it on their own you are asking the government to bail you out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Predators is definitely the wrong comparison. More like carrion eaters.

      Delete
  4. It’s sad but true. Southbridge is more screwed up than the Obamacare website.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Our children should not be for sale to the highest bidder!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. How do you fix a school system when you take its best students and leave behind those that are stumbling? I agree Southbridge is in tough shape. However so many of the promising young leaders are shipped out of system via private education and school choice. It doesn't make for an easy path to redemption for teachers and administrators. On the flip side, my kids deserve the best I can get for them, and I am not always certain I have allowed that by keeping them in the Southbridge Public Schools. We have only 12 years to prepare them for a lifetime. Parenting is very important. So is education. Unfortunately, I do not think teachers in Southbridge are offered the support they need to deal with the daily disruptions and adversities they face. Many of these kids come from troubled homes, where there is little structure, discipline and appreciation for the education they receive. I can see the effort by the administration, however resolution seems so far away... and my children will never receive the benefit. They will graduate long before things get better. Very distressing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So those of us in town with children should just turn a blind eye to the failure of a school district that we're supposed to send our children to? I pay taxes in this town, and my children switched schools this year. In the Southbridge school system, they were pushed aside and virtually ignored so the administration could attend to the children that weren't parented at home. I'm proud to say that they are THRIVING at their new school, and getting the best grades of their lives. And I'm also proud to send the money for their education to a school that will EDUCATE them... The only unfortunate repercussion that we've experienced with our switch is that the Southbridge School System gets to retain $2K of the original $7K.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Bay Path runs TV ads and puts billboards on Rt 20. What's the difference?
    Time to stop complaining and get the job done!
    But our school committee is more interested in power grabs.
    We just got one to leave, McLoughlin should go too. Her comment suggesting that the reason for the disastrous MCAS scores was the "transient" population highlights how unwilling she is to accept responsibility for her actions. Shameful

    ReplyDelete

All comments subject to moderation. All commenters must use their own name or a screen name. No comments labelled as "Anonymous" will be published. To use your name or a screen name select "Name/URL" from the drop down menu. Insert you name in the "Name" space and leave the "URL" space blank.