Matt
Murphy/State House News Service
![]() |
| Gov. Deval Patrick |
Gov. Deval Patrick has proposed to eliminate the cap
on liquor licenses in communities around the state, and local leaders couldn’t
be drunker with delight.
Haverhill Mayor James Fiorentini said his border
city faces competition from New Hampshire retailers, and lifting the limits on
licenses for liquor stores will be a “great help.”
“We have to compete with those damn conservative
Republican socialist liquor stores up in New Hampshire,” Fiorentini said during
a meeting of the Local Government Advisory Commission. “It always struck me as
ironic that a conservative Republican state had state-run liquor stores.”
The mayors, selectmen, school committee members and
other local officials met with members of the Patrick administration on Tuesday
to discuss recent developments with the budget, a supplemental spending bill
and veterans’ issues.
Eric Nakajima, assistant secretary for innovation
policy at the Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development, also gave a
rundown of the governor’s recently filed economic development bill that
includes proposals for tax incentives for workforce training and housing, and
innovation initiatives, and the proposal to turn over full control of the
liquor licensing process to local authorities.
Nakajima said lifting the cap on liquor licenses
will eliminate a “hurdle” for businesses seeking access to liquor licenses that
are often part of larger economic development projects.
“That giant sigh of relief you probably heard was
Mayor Joe Curtatone,” joked Gardner Mayor Mark Hawke, referring to the
Somerville mayor who was not in attendance.
Curtatone appeared with then-Boston Mayor Thomas
Menino and Salem Mayor Kim Driscoll at a legislative hearing in August to
testify in favor of legislation to eliminate the cap, arguing that restaurant
owners find it difficult to locate in Somerville because of a lack of available
licenses.
Hawke recalled how the Gardner Ale House, which
touts itself as the only full-menu brewpub in both North Central Massachusetts
and Worcester County, had to delay its opening by a year as it tried to get
special legislation for a liquor license.
Approving additional liquor licenses for cities and
towns has become a routine function of the House and Senate, usually occurring
during lightly attended informal sessions but only after the bills have passed
through committee and been vetted by lawyers.
As the local officials went around the room Tuesday
to discuss the economic development bill, the conversation kept steering back
to liquor licenses and the number of cities and towns who have bumped up
against the cap.
With the support of Mayor Martin Walsh, Rep. Russell
Holmes and Boston City Councilor Ayanna Pressley have been pushing to lift the
cap on liquor licenses in Boston and turn full control over the licensing
process to the city's Licensing Board as a method for revitalizing certain
neighborhoods.
Waltham Mayor Jeannette McCarthy said her city has a
lot of economic growth occurring along the I-95 corridor and businesses are
constantly asking for liquor licenses.
“We think this is going to bring true economic
development,” she said.
Fiorentini said that for some unknown historical
anomaly his city does not have a cap on the number of liquor licenses it can
award to restaurants, and he called that freedom “a tremendous boon for us
going out, trying to steal a few restaurants from Gardner or Amesbury or wherever.”
The governor’s plan would also create a
“transformative development” fund within MassDevelopment to make equity
investments and provide funding for collaborative workspaces in so-called
Gateway Cities, and expand the Housing Development Incentive Program (HDIP) to
promote market-rate housing in those former industrial centers.
Hawke, whose city of Gardner does not meet the
definition of a Gateway City, called the transformative development fund a
“great idea” that could work in any city, and said the need for market rate
housing is also critical in non-Gateway Cities.
“It’s absolutely needed, but I don’t know that it
needs to be targeted,” he said.

My guess is that the fine liquor license holders in Southbridge will soon be in uproar. And personally, I believe the SLLB and town already has far too much "authority" for their own good.
ReplyDelete