Friday, May 27, 2011

Breaking News on the Charter

Kenneth O’Brien

I now have it on good authority that Councilor blah-blah-blah is lobbying to achieve the objectives to undermine the Charter that I outlined in my post The Next Shoe To Drop .

What is staggering is where the approach is being made.

Here is someone who, behind the scenes, was intimately involved in electing a Republican State Representative.

So, who is she approaching to achieve this end run around the Democratic process of our town?

Making A Stink About Sewer Rates

Kevin N. Christo
Guest Contributor

Once again Southbridge residents are beset with an increase in sewer rates.

It’s bad enough that we are burdened with the economic and environmental consequences of being home to the state’s largest dump.

It is also becoming increasingly costly to dump at home.

No longer can we blithely skip to the loo, my darlings.

We have to weigh the financial implications of bladder and bowel relief.

The time has come to make our town overlords realize that this situation stinks.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

The Next Shoe To Drop

Kenneth M. O’Brien

The hubris of the town manager and the gang of five knows no bounds.

Next Wednesday, June 1, 2011, there will be a meeting of the Council of the Whole.

The purpose of that meeting will be to take up the recommendations of the Charter Review Committee.

The gang of five and the town manager are salivating at the prospect of using their position to cast in stone their stranglehold on town government.
 

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Backstabbers: Part I

Kenneth M. O’Brien

It’s save my butt time for our town manager.

The same is true for the five-member majority now running the town council.

The current Gang of Five that dominates the town council has two objectives.

The first is to preserve the overpaid tenancy of the current town manager in his job.

The second goal is to serve the interests of our corporate landlord, Casella.

But, I can’t help but ask, “Why?”

Sunday, May 22, 2011

WTF Southbridge?

Kenneth M. O’Brien


I confess that I am outspoken and prone to expressing my opinions.

However, as hard as some might find it to believe, others also ask me frequently for my opinion on certain matters.

More often than not, as those who know me will tell you, I conclude my observations with the proviso “That’s my opinion, and it’s worth what you paid for it.”

Friday, May 20, 2011

How To Lower Oil Prices --- UPDATE

Kenneth M. O’Brien

On May 9, I posted an article titled “How To Lower Oil Prices NOW!”

I subsequently sent the piece as a Letter to the Editor that appeared in the Southbridge Evening News.

I even went so far as to send the proposal to our Congressman Richard Neill.

Apparently, there are those who still feel that my ideas are outlandish and of little merit.

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Judging Our Town Government

Kenneth M. O’Brien

On Monday night the five member collusive majority on the Southbridge town council once again backed the town manager’s agenda.
Despite efforts by the four-member minority to reduce the proposed budget, the FOS clique pushed through what served the interests of the town hall bureaucracy.

As a result, you’ll see another property tax increase of at least 3.7 percent. This is on top of a 4 percent increase in water and sewer rates.

I have attempted to find a simple way of summarizing how successful this crew has been in governing this town.

They say that a picture is worth a thousand words.

Therefore, here is my 6,000-word picture essay on how to judge what this group has done on behalf of our town relative to other towns in the area.

Friday, May 13, 2011

Just a reminder...

Bush pledges to get bin Laden, dead or alive
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush pledged anew Friday that Osama bin Laden will be taken "dead or alive," no matter how long it takes…

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Enhanced Distortion

(Download this document)

Kenneth M. O’Brien


In the unending effort to rehabilitate the image of the Bush Administration, Conservative apologists rushed to use the occasion of Bin Laden’s demise to justify the “enhanced interrogation” techniques used and subsequently abandoned by the Bush-Cheney-Rumsfeld triumvirate.

They virtually tripped over one another to seize upon a statement by CIA Director Leon Panetta which they saw as validating their position.

In an interview on NBC Panetta said, "They used these enhanced interrogation techniques against some of these detainees, but I'm also saying that, you know, the debate about whether we would have gotten the same information through other approaches, I think is always going to be an open question."

Monday, May 9, 2011

How To Lower Oil Prices NOW!

Kenneth M. O’Brien

At present a futures trader can control $100 of oil futures contracts with only $6.

This is the magic of what’s called “buying on margin”.

It is the basis for a great deal of speculation in the commodities markets.

It is the Exchanges that dictate the margin requirements on commodities contracts based on their assessment of market risk.

But, there is another, more insidious, element of margin requirements.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

The Cult Of Republicanism

Kenneth M. O'Brien


The party of Lincoln is no longer a political party.

It has devolved into a religious cult.

Reasoned debate, the fundamental basis of a democratic society, no longer exists.

The Republican cult has proclaimed its articles of faith. Those who fail to conform are subject to excommunication.

The Nicene Creed of the Republican Cult has the following tenets:

1) Under no circumstances will we raise taxes. All Republican members of the US House and Senate have signed a pledge by Grover Norquist that they will not raise taxes under any circumstances;

Saturday, April 30, 2011

I.D. To Vote, No I.D. To Kill

Kenneth M. O’Brien

Should registered voters have to show ID’s to vote?

The law in Massachusetts says “NO”!

But, apparently, that is not good enough for some people..

They ask, “Why would you object to showing identification?

Aside from the fact that it is estimated that 20 million American citizens lack a government issued ID, there is an alternative question.

If you want to require a government issued ID to exercise a fundamental right, are you willing to apply it to the exercise of all rights guaranteed under the constitution?

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Coakley Kool Aid


Kenneth M. O’Brien

“Dear Town Councilor O’Brien, 
…  Your latest email does not change our position that this issue is not within this Office’s jurisdiction.   This is a matter that you will need to continue to pursue at the local level or through the courts.    
Kelli E. Gunagan, Assistant Attorney General”

So wrote a representative of the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office to me in an email in June 2008 in regard to my inquiries regarding the legitimacy of the granting of the site assignment to SRD (Casella).

As a consequence, legal action was taken by a number of Southbridge and Sturbridge residents to pursue matters through the courts.
When it comes to defending the rights of citizens, the Attorney General’s Office is populated by graduates of the “Heads I Win, Tails You Lose” School of Law.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

The Budget Plan You Haven’t Heard

Kenneth M. O’Brien


Cut the deficit!

Save Medicare!

It’s the Ryan budget vs. the Obama budget!

If you listen to the media (mainstream or conservative), these are the choices.

And House Conservatives, unanimously endorsing the Ryan plan, have drawn a line in the sand. If they don’t get concessions following Ryan’s plan, then raising the national debt ceiling is in doubt.

If this were not so serious, it would be amusing.

Why?

Because, by its own admission, the Ryan plan increases the budget deficit by $6 trillion over the next ten years.

Now, maybe I’m dense, but how can you hold an increase in the debt-ceiling hostage to a plan that requires such an increase for its success?

The Obama plan is no better.

It would increase the deficit by $7 trillion over the next decade.

Both plans (or so-called budgets) don’t propose balancing the budget until the 2030’s.

Thanks to the media, the American public has been led to believe that these are the choices.

It makes for great television and radio. It allows the talking heads to say it’s either this or that. It’s all about the ratings. The underlying assumption is, of course, that the American public is too stupid to hold more than any two competing ideas in their heads at any time.

It is what is called a Hobson’s choice. According to the Merriam Webster Dictionary, a Hobson’s choice is, “the necessity of accepting one of two or more equally objectionable alternatives.” To put it simply, it would be requiring a man to answer “yes” or “no” to the question, “Have you stopped beating your wife?”

Now, for just a moment, let’s assume that a third alternative was put forward that preserved the existing social safety net and balanced the budget in ten years. However, let’s also assume that the plan was put forward by the American Nazi Party or an American Communist Party.

Would you even look at it?

Probably not. Certainly the media would dismiss it and refuse to cover it.

After all, the question of whether the ideas are valid or the plan would work are irrelevant. The source is fundamentally “un-American” Ideology is all that matters. Thank God we are eliminating the space program because its father, Wernher von Braun was a Nazi, and I’ve really got to reconsider being a Catholic given the history of the current Pope.

The point is that there is an alternative plan.

It preserves the social safety net.

It balances the budget in ten years.

No less a source of Conservative empiricism than The Economist, has stated, “the  Congressional Progressive Caucus plan wins the fiscal responsibility derby thus far; it reaches balance by 2021 largely through assorted tax hikes and defense cuts.’ Which is pretty interesting. Have you ever heard of the Congressional Progressive Caucus budget plan? Neither had I. The caucus's co-chairs, Raul Grijalva of Arizona and Keith Ellison of Minnesota, released it on April 6th. The budget savings come from defence cuts, including immediately withdrawing from Afghanistan and Iraq, which saves $1.6 trillion over the CBO baseline from 2012-2021. The tax hikes include restoring the estate tax, ending the Bush tax cuts, and adding new tax brackets for the extremely rich, running from 45% on income over a million a year to 49% on income over a billion a year.”Ahh, but it’s from the Progressive (read “Liberal”) caucus.

Once again we get to something that is funny if it wasn’t so serious.

The so-called mainstream media (which is supposed to be overwhelmingly “Liberal”) has virtually ignored this proposal.

Liberals may as well call themselves “Nazis” or “Communists”.

Contrary to what the right wing  would like to believe, Liberals are offering real and practical alternatives.

Contrary to what the right wing would like to believe, the media is a tool of corporate profitability, not of reasoned political discourse.

And, contrary to prevailing public opinion, Liberalism does offer a viable alternative to our current descent into social disintegration. In many ways it dovetails nicely with a recent policy proposal for national revitalization put forward by two top Pentagon officials.

The question you have to address is, if it will work, is it more important to you to be a Conservative, a Liberal, or an American?

More to come after you have the chance to review THE PEOPLE’S BUDGET.

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Vampire Capitalism

Kenneth M. O’Brien

How do you define justice?

Was it justice for England to profit from the labor and extorted taxes of the American colonies before the American Revolution?

Was it justice for a few to benefit from the slavery of many prior to the Emancipation Proclamation?

Was it justice for the robber barons of the 19th century to profit from child labor?

There are times when you have to make it a personal story.

Is it justice for billions of dollars to be made by the worldwide pharmaceutical industry as a result of the legal exploitation of one African-American woman?

Well, that is exactly what has happened.

Loretta Pleasant was born in Roanoke, Virginia in 1920.

Over time she changed her first name to Henrietta. In 1941 she married David Lacks.

Just days after a March to end polio in 1951, Henrietta Lacks came to Johns Hopkins complaining of a “painful knot down there.”

She was diagnosed with cervical cancer. Prior to receiving treatment for the tumor, cells from the cancer were removed for research purposes without her knowledge or permission, which was standard procedure at that time.

She died on October 4, 1951 at the age of thiry-one. She was buried without a tombstone in a family cemetery in Lackstown in Halifax County, Virginia.

Why does the story of Henrietta Lacks matter?
Because billions of dollars have been made from those cells extracted from her at Johns Hopkins. As summarized on Wikipedia:

”The cells from Henrietta's tumor were given to researcher George Gey, who "discovered that [Henrietta's] cells did something they'd never seen before: They could be kept alive and grow." Before Henrietta, the cells would only survive for a few days. Gey named the sample "HeLa", after the initial letters of Henrietta Lacks' name, to protect her identity. As the first human cells that could be grown in a lab and were "immortal" (did not die after a few cell divisions), they could then be used for conducting many experiments. This represented an enormous boon to medical and biological research.

”As reporter Michael Rogers stated, the growth of HeLa by a researcher at the hospital helped answer the demands of the 10,000 who marched for a cure to polio just shortly before Lacks' death. By 1954, HeLa was being used by Jonas Salk to develop a vaccine for polio. To test Salk's new vaccine, the cells were quickly put into mass production in the first-ever cell production factory.

“Demand for the HeLa cells quickly grew. Since they were put into mass production, Henrietta's cells have been mailed to scientists around the globe for ‘research into cancer, AIDS, the effects of radiation and toxic substances, gene mapping, and countless other scientific pursuits’. HeLa cells have been used to test human sensitivity to tape, glue, cosmetics, and many other products. Scientists have grown some 20 tons of her cells....
“Doctors still have not discovered the reason for HeLa cells' unique vigor, but suspect that it is due to altered telomerase function. There are almost 11,000 patents involving HeLa cells.”

A donation was eventually made to purchase a headstone for her grave. A few modest tributes were held to honor her contribution to medical science. To this day, however, most of her descendants cannot afford medical insurance.

On May 18, 2010 NBC aired an episode of Law And Order titled “The Immortal” that dramatized a fictional version of the case of Henrietta Lacks.

Rebecca Skloot has written a book titled “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” that provides a compelling narrative of this slice of American history.


What bearing does this story have on issues that are being confronted in today’s hyper-inflammatory political environment?

Because, in the midst of this we have lost sight of the fundamental premise upon which this country is based.


It is not state’s rights.

It is not an economic system.

It is not a religious ideology.

The Constitution of the United States begins with the words, “We the people…”.

The Declaration of Independence says, “We hold these truths to be self evident…”.


It is the “We” that has been lost sight of.

While we supposedly believe that all are created equal, we must realistically realize that not all are endowed with equal gifts. A John Boehner, the son of a bar owner, could never rise to be Speaker of the House in a stratified society. A Bill Clinton, son of a broken home, could never have risen to be President.

But, we are moving inexorably toward defining opportunity based upon current economic status.

We expand the opportunity for all Americans when we realize that we are not wise enough to decide where the next great scientific mind will come from. We expand the opprtunity for all Americans when we realize that, more often than not, the greatest business advances come from those most economically challenged. And, as in the case of Henrietta Lack, we expand the opportunity for all Americans when the least of us provide an unexpected contribution to the public welfare.


But there is no idea of “WE” anymore. It is all about us and them. And the lines are drawn on two fronts. They are drawn along an economic front that extols an unconstrained capitalism that once benefitted from colonialism, once benefitted from slavery, once benefitted from child labor, and that still benefits from the legal necrophilial exploitation of the body of Henrietta Lacks.

On the other front there are those who virulently proclaim that America is a Christian nation. But they extol a distorted vision of Christianity that conveniently forgets the words of Matthew 25:45
'In solemn truth I tell you that in so far as you withheld such services from one of the humblest of these, you withheld them from me.” (Weymouth New Testament)

Until those who are so violently partisan in defending the welfare of the unborn devote at least an equal portion of their time to defending and protecting the welfare of the living, whatever their economic status, until those who seek public office stop making promises that they know that they cannot keep, and until those who claim to be journalists stop distorting facts to sway public opinion to conform to the views of their corporate sponsors, don’t tell me you are the inheritors of the Founding Fathers.


Until you awaken to the pernicious fact that we recognize that bloodless corporations whose sole purpose is to maximize profits have been granted the same status as “persons” under the law, all people will be second class citizens. Not second class to some abstract, mythological threat of socialism, but to the reality that once again, “We the people” are subject to dominance by financial power. This was recently reinforced by the infamous Citizens United case before the Supreme Court.

One can only wonder if Henrietta Lacks would think if she were included in “We the people” if she were still alive?

When does the acceptance of one sacrificial lamb pave the path to a holocaust, all in the name of profit?