Ken O'Brien
The Southbridge Recycling and Disposal Park landfill
will pay nearly $220,000 to settle claims that improper maintenance and
monitoring of a large soil stockpile caused a landslide that damaged adjacent
wetlands, Attorney General Martha Coakley announced today.
The complaint, filed in Suffolk Superior Court with
the consent judgment, alleges that a portion of the stockpile became unstable
and caused a landslide in August 2013, which inundated the banks of a stream in
Charlton with up to a foot of sediment and covered more than half an acre of
vegetated wetlands with mud and silt, ranging from a fine coating to a half
foot of muck.
“Wetland areas are very important environmental
resources and must be safeguarded,” AG Coakley said. “Our office will hold
accountable those who fail to comply with state laws and regulations designed
to protect these valuable resources which benefit the environment in so many
ways.”
According to the complaint, the stockpiled soil had
been excavated during landfill expansion work.
The soil landslide harmed the wetlands, impairing their ability to
protect groundwater, prevent and mitigate flooding and provide habitat for
wildlife.
“Conventional erosion controls on large sites will
often fail during adverse weather. So developers must invest in comprehensive
drainage and erosion controls at the onset of the project to prevent off-site
discharges of silt and soils to wetlands and streams,” said Commissioner David
W. Cash of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP).
“If soils and silt are discharged to wetland resources, the cost of remediating
the damage generally far outweighs the cost of preventing it.”
The complaint alleges that the defendants,
Southbridge Recycling and Disposal Park, Inc. (SRDP), and its parent
corporation, Casella Waste Systems, Inc., violated the Massachusetts Wetlands
Protection Act and Solid Waste Management Act by failing to adequately
implement and maintain the soil stockpile’s stability and erosion controls.
SRDP allegedly did not immediately take action to stabilize the stockpile,
waited for 10 days to report erosion and stability problems, and failed to
mention the massive landslide when discussing other matters with MassDEP.
After reporting the violations to MassDEP, the
defendants promptly hired consultants and began implementing stockpile
stabilization and wetlands restoration work plans. The defendants will continue
to monitor the wetlands areas damaged by the landslide to assure proper
restoration.
Under the terms of the settlement, SRDP and Casella
will pay a $200,000 civil penalty, $50,000 of which will be waived if MassDEP
determines that all required stabilization and restoration work was properly
and timely completed. As part of the settlement,
SRDP will also spend nearly $20,000 on a supplemental environmental project by
purchasing water testing and plotting equipment for Charlton, to be used by the
town’s Water Department and Conservation Commission, as well as by the Central
Massachusetts Regional Storm Water Coalition. This equipment measures, records,
and maps water and waterway resource data to help with storm water control,
watershed management, and wetlands protection.
The case was handled by Assistant Attorney General
Matthew Ireland of AG Coakley’s Environmental Protection Division, with
assistance from Mary Jude Pigsley, MassDEP Chief Regional Counsel, Philip
Nadeau, MassDEP Wetlands and Waterways Regional Section Chief, and Maryann
DiPinto and Marielle Stone, all of MassDEP’s Central Regional Office in
Worcester.

This is simply the cost of doing business, amounting to under 60¢ a ton for our annual processing of MSW. There was nontoxic dirt that slid into the "wetland" was just clean cover.
ReplyDeleteBy next year the so-called wetland will have more flowers and plants due to the free enrichment of the soil.
Although technically Southbridge is responsible for the landfill related liabilty, Charlton probably won't sue because we can cut off their free use of the landfill and when we expand into Charlton after the Site Assignment next year they will get plenty of money to reduce their taxes and improve their schools.
It's no big deal, really.
OK, it is easy to come home and think I got it all figured out, but I have sone questions. What happened to recycleBank, what happened to all the money from the methane, why dies it smell still, why diesn't the Tiown run n the scales...
ReplyDeleteThe price in the Telegram last week fit trash is over $75. A ton, times 300,000 to
Kick them out, and let theTown collect the $ 22 million a YEAR
They get fined more than the town ever did. The Tiwnurs can actualky accept half as much trash, get three times the money, what sense does it make to sell space for $6 a tom now and buy it somewhere else in ten years for $75?
Wendy for Mayor 2016 ;) you got to get your heads out of the Casella Dumpster, out of the stench box you could say, before you could smell the money !!!
Tell that comosny from Vermont to show us the money ir go take a funny, cuz ripping us offfix not funny!
$22,000,000.00 A YEAR!!!