Ken
O’Brien
![]() |
| Video Below |
Mr. Koocher appeared in the context of presenting
the MASC’s potential role in running the town’s search for a new superintendent
of schools.
You will recall that the School Committee appeared to bow to
public pressure back on February 10th by voting to conduct such a
search.
Now, only two months later, Mr. Koocher appeared as
the representative of the only organization that has expressed a firm
willingness to undertake such a task.
However, his ardor for pursuing such a task was
distinctly lukewarm. At least it was in terms of pursuing it now.
He pointed out to the committee that their timing
was inopportune. Most school committees, he maintained, undertake such searches
beginning around Thanksgiving. By so doing they have a better chance of
enticing the most attractive candidates for such a position.
Far be it from me to seem overly skeptical. I may
have my doubts about the degree to which the leadership of the school committee
is committed to this task. I may even suspect that they would like to find a
way to postpone the whole exercise indefinitely.
But I will say that it is a good thing that Mr.
Koocher is not running for a high-profile public office. If he were he might
have to explain how his thinking, in fact his whole position, on the subject of
timing such a search has changed drastically in three-and-a-half months.
You see, back at the end of last December, December
28th to be exact, he was quoted extensively in an article in the
Boston Globe titled “A
rush to pick new school superintendents”. These were among his remarks at
that time:
Winchester,
Waltham, and Mansfield started looking in the fall and have already selected
new superintendents, said Glenn Koocher, executive director of the
Massachusetts Association of School Committees.
“It’s unusual they would all get started so early,’’ said Koocher, whose group is conducting several searches around the state.
“It’s unusual they would all get started so early,’’ said Koocher, whose group is conducting several searches around the state.
Koocher
said districts usually start looking in January and February with hiring in
March so the new superintendents can give 90 days’ notice before starting in
the summer.
“Things
have not slowed down for us on the superintendent searching front,’’ Koocher
said.
“You just never know who will announce their retirement later, rather than sooner. If you are a superintendent, you don’t want to be a lame duck for any longer than you have to be.’’
“You just never know who will announce their retirement later, rather than sooner. If you are a superintendent, you don’t want to be a lame duck for any longer than you have to be.’’
Koocher
said retirements are the biggest reason for superintendent vacancies in the
state. He said the state’s early retirement system is an incentive for people
to leave when they still have 10 years or more of productive service to give.
The last observation was elaborated upon by Danielle
Black, chairwoman of the Weston School Committee. “I’m not sure a
superintendent wants to start the year saying they are looking for a new job.’’
Then there’s the matter of school districts for which
the MASC is currently conducting superintendent searches. Again, from the Globe
article:
Even
though several districts are already done, others including Marshfield, Salem,
Weston, and Braintree are just getting started. And even more will be forced to
look when sitting superintendents create openings by retiring or moving to new
districts, Koocher said.
In addition to these, the MASC website lists Lowell,
Middleborough and Gosnold as communities for whom they are currently conducting
searches. Palmer and Granby are listed as districts in which it has upcoming
searches scheduled.
One could hardly suspect that Mr. Koocher’s remarks had
been tailored to suit the predilections of a constituent school committee’s
leadership. However, I am hard-pressed to explain in any other way his
departure from his earlier remarks as well his organizations current practices.
I am sure that it is merely a reflection of the
difficulties encountered by this school committee in retaining any other firms
to vie for the opportunity to manager the search process. As Mr. Koocher
himself noted, the last three years have been marked by a good deal of "turbulence" on the superintendent front.
Perhaps progress in amending that difficulty will be
resolved this June. A change resulting from the upcoming election might be just
what is needed and allow an “early” start to an otherwise long-delayed quest.

I agree that Koocher's argument about timing due to the candidate pool is bogus. It's far more likely that it is due to the chaos that McLoughlin, Donovan and Quinney have caused. He alluded to this but was bound by simple civility from blaming them outright.
ReplyDeleteMcLoughlin had it right though when she said that the district had a reputation as a "superintendent killer." Her only error was in blaming the district rather than herself and her partners.
It's obvious that McLoughlin and Donovan are still clueless and fearful about seeking a long-term leader for our district; and that's understandable. Remember these two voted to extend Ely's contract for an additional 2 years when they has served less than 72 hours on the committee, and we should all recall how Ely went out.
ReplyDeleteThen we had 18 months of law-suit Buzz. Millions wasted on employee wrongful terminations, no textbooks for students, principals and staff merry-go-round, etc.
The best thing for our students would be to get rid of MSC and Dodo and let the next school committee select a leader, no a retire money hoarder.
What an incredible crock. McLaughlin has already dawdled for 2 months. I doubt that as things stand if they could even get another superintendent before Stanton’s contract expire. Now what are they going to do? Conduct another survey! It’s time to scuttle the whole crew. At the very least get rid McLaughlin, Donovan, Quinney and Abrahamson.
ReplyDeletePlease can we get real. When is enough enough. There is enough local talent in our own system and we will never look into our own because of politics. They all run and say they will look for the betterment, HELLO, what a joke. That is the way this town always works. Can we first forgive and forget and look for our future, we have talent HERE, PLEASE!!!
ReplyDeleteDo you really expect the professionals that McLaughlin and Donovan , and their lackies, have professionally and personally damaged to "forgive and forget?" There is great hatred, and deservedly so, towards these two political hacks. I suspect this hatred will go well beyond their ouster in June. They can not unring the bell or undo the wrongful damage they have done. It angers me when I see these hypocrites at church on Sunday acting as though they are decent human beings - they are not.
DeleteThe sad reality is the damage not only extends to the adults in our system, but to the students, as well.
Stability starts at the top!
ReplyDelete