Ken
O’Brien
The release of a new book called “Clinton Cash” has
the right claiming that it will blow the lid off of the Clinton campaign and
have the Democratic Party throwing in the towel on 2016 in no time. The book is
about the nefarious doings of the evil Clinton Foundation, a non-profit
supposedly dedicated to doing good works around the globe, but which
conservatives say is actually nothing more than a corrupt organization
dedicated to selling out the interests of poor people everywhere so that
Hillary Clinton can destroy the world.
The release of a new book called “Clinton Cash” has
the right claiming that it will blow the lid off of the Clinton campaign and
have the Democratic Party throwing in the towel on 2016 in no time. The book is
about the nefarious doings of the evil Clinton Foundation, a non-profit
supposedly dedicated to doing good works around the globe, but which
conservatives say is actually nothing more than a corrupt organization
dedicated to selling out the interests of poor people everywhere so that
Hillary Clinton can destroy the world.
It must be said at the outset that investigating the
Clinton Foundation is entirely appropriate. It is a major fundraising
organization, lots of wealthy people from around the globe have donated money,
some of whom are not such nice fellows. Now, the taking of money from bad
people and using it to better the lives of poor people around the world should
not automatically be suspect. Some people might even call such a transaction a
form of restitution. But it is certainly worth looking into even the
possibility of an improper quid pro quo between Hillary
Clinton and these nefarious actors when she was Secretary of State. Responsible
journalists can and will undoubtedly be looking at all of this throughout the
campaign as they should.
However, the man who wrote this book “Clinton Cash”
is not a responsible journalist. (Well, unless you consider his affiliations
with Breitbart News an endorsement of his integrity.) The
author, Peter Schweizer, is a long time Republican political operative whose
credibility rests on books such as “Architects of Ruin: How Big Government
Liberals Ruined the Global Economy and Will Do It Again if We Don’t Stop Them”
and ”Makers and Takers:Why conservatives work harder, feel happier, have
closer families, take fewer drugs, give more generously, value honesty more,
are less materialistic and envious, whine less … and even hug their children
more than liberals.” That latter literary masterpiece was actually a
sequel to his earlier work called ”Do as I Say (Not as I Do): Profiles in
Liberal Hypocrisy.” Let’s just say there’s no mistaking Schweizer for an
unbiased journalist.
Rachel Maddow addressed Schweizer’s past history on
her show last evening.
(Media Matters has compiled a full dossier on Schweizer’s reporting inaccuracies and far right connections. They are as deep as they are wide.)
The fact that a right-wing propagandist would
publish an “exposé” on Hillary Clinton is as surprising as Bill O’Reilly
proclaiming himself to be a war hero. This is just how the right rolls. You’ll
undoubtedly recall the work of fiction called “Unfit for
Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry” by another far
right operative by the name of Jerome Corsi which, when it was published in
2004 took the election by storm. It was an audacious move and it paid off. One
can certainly understand why they’d try it again.
When the little boy who cried wolf was eventually confronted with a wolf, the wolf ate him.
ReplyDeleteMy point? At least the last time the boy cried wolf, there wolf was REAL. There are authentic concerns in " Clinton Cash", despite the author being significantly imperfect.
Why do messengers get often judged instead of the message?
One does not need to rely on this book to dislike Hillary Clinton.
Half the nation believes Hillary is not trustworthy, she represented Monsanto, and authorized George Bush to invade Iraq.
Speaking of wolves, I will "cry wolf". Hillary is a wolf in democratic sheep skin. Do not let her devour the Democratic before rejecting her candidacy?
What has she accomplished?
The mystery is why she is so hated by Republicans.