By
Matt Murphy State House News Service
![]() |
| John Jenkins |
All six members of the Massachusetts Department of
Transportation board whose resignations were sought by Gov. Charlie Baker have
agreed to step down, paving the way for Baker to remake the leadership team in
charge of the embattled MBTA.
Almost a week after Baker and Transportation Secretary
Stephanie Pollack requested the resignations of the board members, all of whom
were appointed by the governor's predecessor Deval Patrick, the officials on
Tuesday complied either verbally or in writing. Pollack is the only person who
will remain on the board.
"The Governor is grateful for all of the
members' service to the Commonwealth, is thankful for their recommendations and
looks forward to assembling a new team of transportation experts to assist
MassDOT," Baker spokesman Tim Buckley said.
MassDOT board chairman John Jenkins and board
members Andrew Whittle, Robin Chase, Joseph C. Bonfiglio and Dominic Blue all
submitted letters of resignation, while long-time board member Janice Loux
communicated verbally with the governor's team indicating she would step down.
The terms of two board members — Chase, the founder
and former CEO of Zipcar, and Bonfiglio, a business manager for the
Massachusetts and Northern New England Laborers' District Council — were due to
expire this September.
Whittle could have served until September 2016,
while the terms on the board for Jenkins and Blue, who only joined in October
2013, ran through the fall of 2017.
Loux, the executive vice president of the UNITE HERE
union representing hotel, gaming and food service employees, is the longest
serving board member, and her term was due to run into 2018. Loux was appointed
by five governors, including Republicans, to serve on the board of the MBTA
until former Gov. Patrick put her on the merged MassDOT board after the 2009
reform of the transportation bureaucracy.
The Baker administration declined to release the
resignation letters turned in by the board members.
Jenkins appeared to strike a defiant tone last week
in the face of recommendations that the MBTA be put under the oversight of a
control board.
Baker is expected to file legislation, possibly as
soon as this week, calling for the MBTA to be put under the authority of a
fiscal and management control board for three to five years, a recommendation
made by a task force assembled by Baker to review the transit agency after its
dismal winter performance.
The task force's report contained a scathing
assessment of management at the T, faulting the agency for failing to spend as
much as $2.2 billion in authorized capital financing to help clear a backlog of
maintenance project and for overseeing a staff rife with
"absenteeism."
"The Legislature created us, and the
Legislature will have to eliminate us. So that report means nothing until the
Legislature acts," Jenkins after a MassDOT board meeting last Wednesday.
The governor's move toward putting the MBTA under
the oversight of a three-member control board has also run into some skepticism
from members of the Legislature and the T's interim General Manager Frank
DePaola.
DePaola, at a forum last week at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, raised concerns over how the control board would fit
into the structure established by the 2009 reform law that put the
transportation department and the MBTA under one umbrella.
Baker, during an appearance Tuesday morning on
Boston Herald Radio, said he had a "clarifying conversation" with
DePaola after his comments were made, but subsequently said that DePaola was
simply "musing" when he raised "perfectly legitimate"
issues about how the MassDOT board and the new MBTA control board would work
together.
"He was never not on board, let's put it that
way," Baker said.
Sen. Thomas McGee, a Lynn Democrat and co-chair of
the Transportation Committee, said last week that he would withhold judgement
on a control board until after he can question members of the governor's task
force. Task force members are due to appear before McGee's committee on Monday.
"I'd love to ask the panel: What's the control
board makeup? What's it going to do? What are their responsibilities? And what
was their perspective on how the current board was not working?" McGee
said.
Asked if he thought the current board had inhibited
reforms, McGee said, "I don't believe they did."

No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments subject to moderation. All commenters must use their own name or a screen name. No comments labelled as "Anonymous" will be published. To use your name or a screen name select "Name/URL" from the drop down menu. Insert you name in the "Name" space and leave the "URL" space blank.